Saturday, May 8, 2021

My Ft. Howard and John Infantino Facebook Message to Congressman Ruppersberger

On December 21, 2013 I sent the following Facebook message to Maryland Congressman Dutch Ruppersberger, about the Ft. Howard VAMC property being leased to conman John Infantino. I have to post it as snipped images, overlapping so that they are clearly one message. This is to show that I have contacted Ruppersberger about the Fort Howard fiasco and John David Infantino's multiple other scams. This for those who question the work I have been doing for years, and doubt it, and for any reporters or investigative law enforcement who should have gone after John Infantino years ago.

The only link in it that still works is for my blog, but you cannot click on the links you'd have to write them in. John David has taken down the Federal Asset Management and Bayside at Ft Howard scam web sites. 

John D. Infantino committed major frauds, against every American Citizen tax payer, veterans, and on and on around the world. He is till at it somewhere. The VA and other con game victims of his need to know and learn not to have such cons by anyone run on them.  






Thursday, March 11, 2021

Construction and Management Problems at 317 E North Ave Baltimore

Due to the poorly executed reconstruction work on the apartment building, along with the landlord's rental agents' deadly disrespect for the tenants, I left my apartment at 317 E. North Ave Apt. 313, Baltimore, Md. after the lease was up. The bathroom had a step-in shower, but when I moved in the drain pipe was not connected and the first shower I took ran water into the apartment below. My unit was not the only one rented out with an unconnected shower drain. After the drain was installed, shower water still ran into the apartment below. I had to duct tape along the base of the shower and the bathroom floor, because it was not sealed by caulking. 

Our elevator was not working for around ten days. The rental agent sent me an email saying it was going to be worked on, but never said how long the elevator would be out. There are plenty of residents who do not use the Internet. Management never posted signs saying it was out of service, so we had to wait at the elevator long enough to give it up and walk the steps. We should have been informed, so we could plan our trips out and stock up with food & other needs so we did not have to go to the store again until the elevator was running. Plus, there's possibilities of resident's relatives or friends offering those residents a temporary place to stay or to run errands for them - those among us residents who no longer can navigate steps very well. 

The landlord had to replace the elevator's mainboard, which required manufacturing. I understand that these things happen, and that mainboards need to be ordered and manufactured, but not telling the residents that the elevator would be out of service for approximately ten days is not right.

That is the noisiest, most shaking elevator I was ever in. It sounds like rusty cables and worn out hydraulics. The craziest thing I've seen the elevator do sometimes is right after the door begins closing the elevator jumps up and down several inches. That is freaky. 

When the elevator was out of service, I had to use the steps in the center of the building, which was very difficult due to painful arthritic knees, degenerative back disease and shortness of breath. I am 70-years-old. So I went to the fire escape stairs at the end of the building - stairs that are not marked as being for fire emergency use only - to see if they were less painful for me to use. They weren't, but when I tried to reenter the hallway, the doors are locked to prevent anyone from getting out of that stairway. I was up and down those stairs finding doors locked. It was so stressful that it had me seriously upset, having difficulty breathing, physically stressed - with increases in bodily pain - to the point I feared a heart attack. 

I had a pocket knife that I used to jimmy a door open. Had there been a fire, as we upper floor residents escaped downstairs and if the fire moved fast into the lower levels of the stairway, preventing us from descending the stairs, we'd be trapped. I see that as a gross violation against fire safety.


For the final several weeks of me living there, the rear entrance door, our most used entrance and exit, has a failing lock system. Sometimes the electric lock held, but other times the lock did not prevent the door being opened. Leaving us residents in danger of becoming victims of crime. 


Our apartment doors only have one lock - a deadbolt. My apartment door is hung so sloppily that you can see through the cracks into the hallway, and it was so high off the floor that I could see the hall light shadows of people walking past or stopping at the door. A 12-year-old kid could easily kick those flimsily locked apartment doors open.

   

The kitchen floor of 313 has a dangerous trip hazard, caused by floor tiles not installed levelly. A person could be tripped and fall right on the stove. I only tripped on it once, when I first wore some shower shoes. I have degenerative back disease that - several decades ago - has been aggravated by a small slip of my boot sole on an ice-cube-amount of water on a motel hallway floor, and that little slip put me back in the VA hospital's physical rehab section. 


There are no handrails on the one step in the apartment and the several steps in the hallway I had to use. The dark stain on my wall was from me placing my forearm against it to use the flat wall like a handrail. 




The hallways are the weirdest I have ever encountered. They slope downwards, and have two humps in them. Could be good fun for toddlers to roll down on in little ridable cars. But the weirdness makes me concerned about other odd construction not visible. The building was originally two sets of townhomes, each set first constructed over a hundred years ago. I suspect that the hallway humps have something to do with connecting the townhomes together. I looked at the front of the building to see if each original living unit was lower or higher then the ones next to them, but they are level by the street view. 




I used a brand new office chair with rollers, and the living room floor pealed up under the wheels. The floor is a fake wood decorated tape wallboard kind of cheap garbage. 

Twenty-some-mile-an-hour winds make the roof rattle, because it isn't nailed down tight. It sounds like 5 to 10 mph stronger winds can break the roof off in pieces and carry it away. There are leaks in the roof that rainwater has come from and damaged the living room ceiling and walls. 

Then I had to keep quiet about all that or fear retribution - from people with 24hr access and keys to my home.

What worries me most is that the visible evidences of lousy reconstruction indicates that there are unseen problems, some of which may be electrical fire hazards. The entire building might collapse.

The resulting anxiety and depression I experienced came close to killing me. Several times, on several different days, I could feel life going out of me. I had to calm myself down and talk myself through those sickening, terrifying feelings of hot vomit flowing all under my skin. I did not have the money to move into a new home, and needed help just taking a few heavy suitcases out of that old apartment and to storage. 

Together, all that probably cut some years off of my natural life expectancy.  
 

Sunday, August 23, 2020

John Infantino's Grande Scam Claims These Are Bios For His Staff - Which I Doubt Is True


This list of senior staff bios below - for John Infantino's Grande scam - is possibly completely false. It comes from a PDF John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is an outstanding real estate developer. 

If I were one of these individuals, I'd be livid at Infantino for misusing my good name to run his scams.


Thursday, August 20, 2020

List of John Infantino's Finance Partners whom Not Actually Are

This list of finance partners below - for John Infantino's Grande scam - is completely false. It comes from a PDF John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is an outstanding real estate developer. 

If I was owner, employee, investor, or stock holder in any of these corporations, I be livid at Infantino for misusing my good name to run his scams.




John Infantino Grande's List of Banks for Relationships He Fakes

If Infantino actually has any good relationships with any banks, he keeps proceeds from his international scams in them. This list of banks below is for completely false relationships that John D. Infantino touts on his fake investment site for his bogus Grande Organization. It comes from a fake site John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam site The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is an outstanding real estate developer. 

If I were an owner, employee or stock holder of any of those banks, I'd be livid about my corporation's good name being used as leverage to pry monies out of scam victims.





John Infantino's Grande Investment Portfolio Fake is Four Billion Dollars Worth of Nothing

This investment portfolio below is completely false. Four billion dollars worth of nothing. It comes from a brochure John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam site The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is one outstanding real estate developer. 

That First Public Trust logo is for a corporation which has never existed, but Infantino touts it as his century old family business where he became an internationally leading property developer. The name is like a magician's trick: to make a person think that it is for a real corporation that is trustworthy. Infantino's modus operandi is to first get the public to trust him, then scam tons of money out of them. 

The brochure is at this link: 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxIzRHwses8yd2VPZ0lzVGlTRHM/view


 

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Infantino Makes False Claims That He Is An Asset Manager For VA Facilities and His Ft. Howard VA Development Is Complete

The first lease to the Fort Howard, Md., Department of Veterans Affairs property, for the development of a proposed veterans community - John D. Infantino's bogus Bayside at Fort Howard - on valuable Chesapeake Bay waterfront, was terminated after Infantino did not take any steps to begin the actual development or construction of the Project. Never the less, he purports that the Bayside at Fort Howard project is a success, and he uses it as a reference to convince investors that he is a very successful real estate developer and property asset manager. Nothing he says about his professional history and business references is factual. 

In the snipped images seen below, Infantino claims that Bayside at Ft. Howard is a successful project, and he claims to be the asset manager of several VA facilities:

United States Soldier's and Airmen's Home; 

Durham, North Carolina VA's Medical Research Building; 

Philadelphia VA Medical Center; 

San Diego VA Medical Center; 

and the San Francisco VA Medical Center. 

It's all lies, which devastate his investor scam victims, and entire communities suffer the losses he inflicts on them when they publicly trust him. That First Public Trust on the PDF never existed. Web search and find me some info on it, if you don't believe me. And that Grande Corporation logo is John David Infantino's current base for his scams. 

The PDF where the images below came from was created in or after 2017, and is at this link:    

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxIzRHwses8yd2VPZ0lzVGlTRHM/view












Monday, August 17, 2020

John Infantino Did Not Apply For Rezoning of Ft. Howard

 The first lease to the Fort Howard, Md., Department of Veterans Affairs property, for the development of a proposed veterans community - John D. Infantino's bogus Bayside at Fort Howard - on valuable Chesapeake Bay waterfront was terminated after Infantino did not do anything to make the project happen, but file a development plan. He purported that he needed to develop the property into 1,300 residential units, for it to be economically viable, but the land was zoned for 550 and many Ft. Howard area residents wanted it lowered to a more reasonable 350. Infantino did not try to have Baltimore County rezone the property for 1,300 homes. He submitted plans for 1,300 living units and "170,000 square feet of amenities and services", anyway.

What is copied below comes from court records when Infantino sued the United States (every American citizen) as a 'smoke screen' to cover his scams:

"FHSHA (Ft. Howard Senior Housing Associates) was required under the Lease to comply with County requirements or seek a modification of the requirements. Here, the government argues, it is undisputed that FHSHA never submitted a formal permit application to Baltimore County requesting approval for 1,300 units or otherwise asking the County to modify the zoning restrictions that limited to 550 the number of units that could be built at the Fort Howard site.

FHSHA next argues that its failure to construct the CBOC (Community Based Outpatient Clinic) xshould be excused because the parties were mutually mistaken regarding two facts underlying their Lease. First, FHSHA argues that the parties were mutually mistaken in their belief that the County would approve FHSHA's construction of 1,300 housing units at Fort Howard under the Lease. Second, FHSHA argues that the parties were mutually mistaken in their understanding that "Baltimore County [would] not have authority to issue permits but [would] be given [only] a courtesy review of site plans." Compl. ¶ 67.

The government argues that FHSHA was obligated to comply with Baltimore County density requirements and thus bore the risk of the County not approving the construction of 1,300 units at the Fort Howard site. In such circumstances, the government argues, FHSHA cannot rely on reformation of the Lease as a basis for finding that its failure to construct the CBOC was excused.

The court agrees with the government. As discussed above, although the Development Plan provided that FHSHA intended to build 1,300 units, the Lease expressly provided that the Lease, not the Development Plan, controlled and stated that the VA did not represent or warrant that the Fort Howard site would be suitable for any particular purpose. Def.'s App'x 54, Article 24.H. Thus, the Development Plan's statement that the proposed site was in keeping with Baltimore County's intent for the area is not relevant. Because, as discussed above, the Lease required FHSHA to comply with state and local requirements associated with the development and construction of the project, FHSHA was required to obtain county approval to build the full 1,300 units, and thus assumed the risk that it would not be able to obtain such approval when it signed the Lease. Accordingly, there was no mutual mistake. In such circumstances, the court finds that FHSHA cannot establish that it is legally entitled to reformation of the Lease.

As discussed above, the court agrees that the Lease required FHSHA to obtain Baltimore County's approval for the development of the property. If FHSHA knew that it would have to construct 1,300 units rather than 550 units to make the Lease viable, FHSHA was required at a minimum to try to get permission from the County to build more than 550 units. The undisputed facts show, however, that FHSHA never sought a variance from Baltimore County. To the contrary, FHSHA decided not to seek a variance, but instead sought only an exemption from local land use rules. See supra n. 15. A request for an exemption is not the same as seeking to comply with local land use requirements through the variance process or otherwise.

Because FHSHA bore the risk under the Lease for complying with Baltimore County's density requirements and failed to even attempt to comply with Baltimore County's zoning code, it cannot show that its failure to construct the CBOC should be excused because it could not finance the project. FHSHA simply failed to fulfill its obligations under the Lease. As such, the court finds that FHSHA's impossibility defense fails as a matter of law.16"

 "5. The Development Plan

As described in Article 10.A.1 of the Lease, "Lessee has commenced and completed the Development Plan which sets forth Lessee's overall plans, including but not limited to planned Permitted Uses for the Parcels, for developing the Property into the Project pursuant to this Lease. . . ." Id. at 23, Article 10.A.1.3 The Development Plan includes, amongst other items, the obligation to construct 1,300 units—including 353 active senior units; 481 independent living units; 165 assisted living units; and 106 skilled nursing units—and 170,000 square feet of amenities and services. Id. at 98, 103.4 Pursuant to Article 4.A.3 of the Lease, FHSHA was required to develop the Property in accordance with the Development Plan. Id. at 10."

Court report copied from:

https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20150601917