Sunday, May 16, 2021

People Need to Face It That the Ft. Howard Development is Still Stalled

 Right now! It is time for citizens to make known to the VA, politicians, and media that what is happening to the former VA Hospital on Ft. Howard is a terrible thing. If you don’t, I suspect a lot of people will really regret it. The US Government is going to do something with the property. I had a conversation with the Baltimore VA's R. David Edwards - Chief, Public and Community Relations. Mr. Edwards informed me that the VA gets three chances to have a VA property redeveloped. Then the General Services Administration takes over the property and has a list of three other entities whom the property is offered to. If number one turns it down, number two is offered; then if that is not accepted number three has a shot at it. I cannot recall the names on that list, and if they all turn it down I cannot recall what he said happens next but the land may be sold. Either way, veterans loose it, and the Ft Howard area communities may be negatively impacted by the next use of that federal property.

I do not know if the VA has or has not begun to make moves towards cancelling the current lease to Ft Howard, but they may be. The tricky question I do not have the answer to is whether the current lease holder is still the second one, Tim Munshell, or the current developer, Sam Himmelrich, has a third lease. About a year ago, Mr. Himmelrich and I exchanged some emails, then had a long conversation on the phone. He invited me down to see the work he has accomplished in restoring the Ft. Howard campus. He is a fan of my photography, and I was to take photos and write about it. Sam Himmelrich is the first actual, experienced and successful real estate developer to work on the property. Sam no longer answers my emails.
Due to the first lease holder, John David Infantino, being nothing but a conman who has never done any development, the VA made a serious mistake by signing the lease with him. I say his lease should not count in the "three strikes you’re’ out" regulation that puts the property up for grabs by entities outside the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Tim Munshell has no full project development experience or abilities, but he did study the property and was hired by Himmelrich to do what Tim actually does well on a development project. Which I have said all along Munshell was up to – to be between the VA and a real developer.
If people do not get with this and make some efforts to force the VA into setting this situation right, veterans and the Fort Howard, Chesapeake Terrace, Millers Island, Lodge Forrest, Lodge Farm and Edgemere neighborhoods may very well be grossly, negatively impacted.
The US Government is going to do something with the property.
Do all you can to assure it has a positive outcome.
The photo is of the entrance to the Ft. Howard VA property on Easter Sunday 2021. That yellow gate should be closed and locked. I did not step further towards the tall fence to see if there is a lock on it, because that could get police called for trespassing. It had rained several days prior, so I saw that the washed out tree debris would have shown tire tracks if vehicles had been in there recent to that day. Which means if there are not security guards living in there, then there may not be any security. Himmelrich did have good security posted there.



Court Report from John Infantino Suing the US About the VA Cancelling His Ft. Howard Lease

The first lease holder to the Ft. Howard VAMC property, who had promised to build a veterans community there, consistently claimed that the federal property is exempt from county and state codes, taxes and laws. He claimed that the development was undoable due to Baltimore County, Maryland and the Department of Veterans Affairs insisting he adhere to legal requirements, and that the lease exempted him from those requirements. After he did not perform any work on the project, the VA canceled the lease. Then he sued the United States - YOU - for the lease being cancelled. In that law suit, it is proven that the lease holder does have to adhere to local and state building requirements. This is from that law suit court report:

"Plaintiff (John Infantino) recognizes that the Lease states that FHSHA (Ft. Howard Senior Housing Associates) would comply with "applicable local and State laws, codes and ordinances," but argues that the Federal government's exemption from such laws means that none of the state or local requirements or taxes are "applicable."
"Plaintiff (John Infantino) recognizes that the Lease states that FHSHA (Ft. Howard Senior Housing Associates) would comply with "applicable local and State laws, codes and ordinances," but argues that the Federal government's exemption from such laws means that none of the state or local requirements or taxes are "applicable."
The government argues that it did not breach its duty to cooperate or violate any implied warranties because the VA, in the terms of the Lease, exercised its statutory authority to require such compliance. The government argues that the version of 38 U.S.C. § 8166(a)8 in effect at the time the parties entered into the Lease gave the VA the "discretion" to require a lessee that enters into an EUL to comply with state or local requirements relating to land use, building codes, permits or inspections and thus the VA was entitled to require compliance with state and local laws and regulations. Specifically, the government relies on the second sentence of § 8166(a), contending that it expressly states that any construction, alteration, repair, remodeling, or improvement" is not subject to state or local "land use, building codes, permits, or inspections unless the Secretary provides otherwise." 38 U.S.C. § 8166(a) (emphasis added). The government argues that the Lease by its terms demonstrates that the Secretary of the VA did not exempt FHSHA from complying with state and local laws, instead stating in Articles 4.A.1, 4.A.2, and 10.H.1 that FHSHA is subject to all applicable laws. According to the government, "applicable" laws include the local Baltimore County zoning requirements.
it is clear that these terms unambiguously state that state and local laws are relevant to the project. Plaintiff's contention that "applicable" should be read to mean "none" is simply inconsistent with the plain language of the lease and must be rejected. Accordingly, the VA's later insistence that FHSHA comply with state and local laws was not a breach of the lease, but rather entirely consistent with it.
The Lease expressly required that FHSHA
pay and discharge, . . . prior to delinquency, all taxes, general and special assessments, and other charges of every description that during the term of this Lease may be levied or assessed against the Property and all interests therein and all improvements and other property thereon, whether belonging to [the VA] or the Lessee.
Def.'s App'x 44, Article 17.B. Accordingly, if a state or local government imposed taxes on FHSHA's interest in the property, FHSHA was obligated to pay such taxes and the VA did not have the power under § 8167 to exempt FHSHA from paying state or local taxes."

I Am Not the First To Go Online about John Infantino

I am not the first to go online about John Infantino. Maybe these peoples' words will provide everyone with acceptable witnessing about a tried and true international scammer named John David Infantino. 

The Truth about Federal Development – the ugly truth about a Washington D.C. based real estate development firm… (wordpress.com)

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

I Just Sent This Email About Ft. Howard to the Maryland Attorney General

consumer@oag.state.md.us 

Were American Military Veterans Repaid Deposits Made for Failed Housing at Fort Howard? 

In 2014, your office had a court case against John David Infantino, who's - "veterans focused" - proposed Bayside at Fort Howard residential, retail, commercial and medical development project for the former Ft. Howard VA Hospital property failed to materialize. Your office - as per a phone conversation - swore to me that all the deposits were repaid. I am requesting proof that the monies were returned to the depositors.   

The VA had cancelled their Ft. Howard lease with John Infantino several years prior to the court case. With that court legal determination, you told John David to take down his website for Bayside at Ft. Howard, which he had kept up online to help him convince potential investor/scam victims that he was a success at creating the promised vets' community and was working on other projects worth investing in. He took it down, then a few months later I found it up online again, because I have worked at hundreds of hours of investigating and tracking John D Infantino's online activities. I immediately informed your office that the website was back online, and was told, "Well if it is, he'll never build another thing in Maryland." To which I replied, "He never has and never will build anything anywhere. He is nothing but a conman." And then was told by your staff member that they them self had read some of what I posted online about Infantino, and simply said something to the effect that yeah Infantino is a bad guy.  

As per an article in the East County Times, one vet depositor and his wife had sold their home in expectation of moving to Bayside at Ft. Howard, then when the development only seemed stalled to them, they moved into temporary shelter in their son's garage. We can reasonably surmise that other depositors had their lives upended in similar ways. 

The Ft Howard VAMC development is a 19-year fiasco of a complete failure, which leaves the property rotting, vandalized, 8 arsons occurred destroying millions of dollars of the best, 1900-era, old time craftsmen constructed, large beautiful, Chesapeake Bay/Patapsco River waterfront homes that were originally for Army officers' families circa World War One.

You need to get onboard with those of us who are now fully confronting the issue and demanding that it be resolved by having something positive done with the Ft. Howard VAMC grounds for veterans and the affected communities of the Ft. Howard, Maryland area. 

Please provide us with a list of the Bayside at Ft. Howard depositors who were or were not repaid by John D. Infantino.

Here is the link to my blog post about the court case:

The Way That I See It Is...: Ft. Howard Infantino Lawsuit Won Not Much (davidrobertcrews.blogspot.com)

Here is the link to my blog post about the Bayside at Fort Howard website being reposted after your office thought it was permanently offline:

The Way That I See It Is...: Infantino Maintains Phoney Ft. Howard Webpages (davidrobertcrews.blogspot.com)

 

Photography and Writings by David Robert Crews {a.k.a. ursusdave} 

(former US Army photographer and several times a patient at the former Ft. Howard VAMC Hospital)  

Saturday, May 8, 2021

My Ft. Howard and John Infantino Facebook Message to Congressman Ruppersberger

On December 21, 2013 I sent the following Facebook message to Maryland Congressman Dutch Ruppersberger, about the Ft. Howard VAMC property being leased to conman John Infantino. I have to post it as snipped images, overlapping so that they are clearly one message. This is to show that I have contacted Ruppersberger about the Fort Howard fiasco and John David Infantino's multiple other scams. This for those who question the work I have been doing for years, and doubt it, and for any reporters or investigative law enforcement who should have gone after John Infantino years ago.

The only link in it that still works is for my blog, but you cannot click on the links you'd have to write them in. John David has taken down the Federal Asset Management and Bayside at Ft Howard scam web sites. 

John D. Infantino committed major frauds, against every American Citizen tax payer, veterans, and on and on around the world. He is till at it somewhere. The VA and other con game victims of his need to know and learn not to have such cons by anyone run on them.  






Thursday, March 11, 2021

Construction and Management Problems at 317 E North Ave Baltimore

Due to the poorly executed reconstruction work on the apartment building, along with the landlord's rental agents' deadly disrespect for the tenants, I left my apartment at 317 E. North Ave Apt. 313, Baltimore, Md. after the lease was up. The bathroom had a step-in shower, but when I moved in the drain pipe was not connected and the first shower I took ran water into the apartment below. My unit was not the only one rented out with an unconnected shower drain. After the drain was installed, shower water still ran into the apartment below. I had to duct tape along the base of the shower and the bathroom floor, because it was not sealed by caulking. 

Our elevator was not working for around ten days. The rental agent sent me an email saying it was going to be worked on, but never said how long the elevator would be out. There are plenty of residents who do not use the Internet. Management never posted signs saying it was out of service, so we had to wait at the elevator long enough to give it up and walk the steps. We should have been informed, so we could plan our trips out and stock up with food & other needs so we did not have to go to the store again until the elevator was running. Plus, there's possibilities of resident's relatives or friends offering those residents a temporary place to stay or to run errands for them - those among us residents who no longer can navigate steps very well. 

The landlord had to replace the elevator's mainboard, which required manufacturing. I understand that these things happen, and that mainboards need to be ordered and manufactured, but not telling the residents that the elevator would be out of service for approximately ten days is not right.

That is the noisiest, most shaking elevator I was ever in. It sounds like rusty cables and worn out hydraulics. The craziest thing I've seen the elevator do sometimes is right after the door begins closing the elevator jumps up and down several inches. That is freaky. 

When the elevator was out of service, I had to use the steps in the center of the building, which was very difficult due to painful arthritic knees, degenerative back disease and shortness of breath. I am 70-years-old. So I went to the fire escape stairs at the end of the building - stairs that are not marked as being for fire emergency use only - to see if they were less painful for me to use. They weren't, but when I tried to reenter the hallway, the doors are locked to prevent anyone from getting out of that stairway. I was up and down those stairs finding doors locked. It was so stressful that it had me seriously upset, having difficulty breathing, physically stressed - with increases in bodily pain - to the point I feared a heart attack. 

I had a pocket knife that I used to jimmy a door open. Had there been a fire, as we upper floor residents escaped downstairs and if the fire moved fast into the lower levels of the stairway, preventing us from descending the stairs, we'd be trapped. I see that as a gross violation against fire safety.


For the final several weeks of me living there, the rear entrance door, our most used entrance and exit, has a failing lock system. Sometimes the electric lock held, but other times the lock did not prevent the door being opened. Leaving us residents in danger of becoming victims of crime. 


Our apartment doors only have one lock - a deadbolt. My apartment door is hung so sloppily that you can see through the cracks into the hallway, and it was so high off the floor that I could see the hall light shadows of people walking past or stopping at the door. A 12-year-old kid could easily kick those flimsily locked apartment doors open.

   

The kitchen floor of 313 has a dangerous trip hazard, caused by floor tiles not installed levelly. A person could be tripped and fall right on the stove. I only tripped on it once, when I first wore some shower shoes. I have degenerative back disease that - several decades ago - has been aggravated by a small slip of my boot sole on an ice-cube-amount of water on a motel hallway floor, and that little slip put me back in the VA hospital's physical rehab section. 


There are no handrails on the one step in the apartment and the several steps in the hallway I had to use. The dark stain on my wall was from me placing my forearm against it to use the flat wall like a handrail. 




The hallways are the weirdest I have ever encountered. They slope downwards, and have two humps in them. Could be good fun for toddlers to roll down on in little ridable cars. But the weirdness makes me concerned about other odd construction not visible. The building was originally two sets of townhomes, each set first constructed over a hundred years ago. I suspect that the hallway humps have something to do with connecting the townhomes together. I looked at the front of the building to see if each original living unit was lower or higher then the ones next to them, but they are level by the street view. 




I used a brand new office chair with rollers, and the living room floor pealed up under the wheels. The floor is a fake wood decorated tape wallboard kind of cheap garbage. 

Twenty-some-mile-an-hour winds make the roof rattle, because it isn't nailed down tight. It sounds like 5 to 10 mph stronger winds can break the roof off in pieces and carry it away. There are leaks in the roof that rainwater has come from and damaged the living room ceiling and walls. 

Then I had to keep quiet about all that or fear retribution - from people with 24hr access and keys to my home.

What worries me most is that the visible evidences of lousy reconstruction indicates that there are unseen problems, some of which may be electrical fire hazards. The entire building might collapse.

The resulting anxiety and depression I experienced came close to killing me. Several times, on several different days, I could feel life going out of me. I had to calm myself down and talk myself through those sickening, terrifying feelings of hot vomit flowing all under my skin. I did not have the money to move into a new home, and needed help just taking a few heavy suitcases out of that old apartment and to storage. 

Together, all that probably cut some years off of my natural life expectancy.  
 

Sunday, August 23, 2020

John Infantino's Grande Scam Claims These Are Bios For His Staff - Which I Doubt Is True


This list of senior staff bios below - for John Infantino's Grande scam - is possibly completely false. It comes from a PDF John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is an outstanding real estate developer. 

If I were one of these individuals, I'd be livid at Infantino for misusing my good name to run his scams.


Thursday, August 20, 2020

List of John Infantino's Finance Partners whom Not Actually Are

This list of finance partners below - for John Infantino's Grande scam - is completely false. It comes from a PDF John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is an outstanding real estate developer. 

If I was owner, employee, investor, or stock holder in any of these corporations, I be livid at Infantino for misusing my good name to run his scams.




John Infantino Grande's List of Banks for Relationships He Fakes

If Infantino actually has any good relationships with any banks, he keeps proceeds from his international scams in them. This list of banks below is for completely false relationships that John D. Infantino touts on his fake investment site for his bogus Grande Organization. It comes from a fake site John Infantino created for his latest, and still active, investment scam site The Grande Organization. Nothing listed on Infantino's Grande this, and Grande that, is actually his. The numerous, upscale listings on the site either do not exist, or do not have a connection to John David Infantino. He uses that fake site to convince his investment scam victims that he is an outstanding real estate developer. 

If I were an owner, employee or stock holder of any of those banks, I'd be livid about my corporation's good name being used as leverage to pry monies out of scam victims.